Why is visa not equivalent to visa status in the US?
This question is more on history than on current issues, but I didn't know what would be a more appropriate place to ask it.
Visa laws in the US are pretty crazy and differ from most other countries. First of all, the validity of visa here is not equivalent to the validity of the visa status. It is typical here for a student to get a visa, which is valid for 1-3 years, and be admitted to a 6 year program, during which it is legal to stay in the US, but a re-entry would require getting a new visa.
Moreover, it is not possible to obtain/change the US visa while staying inside the country, yet it is possible to change the status.
What are the historical roots of this weird system? Has it been like that in other countries as well (and they changed it), or is it a totally US thing?
Best Answer
It is not particularly weird, although probably different from many countries.
The situation is similar in Canada where the border officer grants status upon entry and the validity of visa itself can be different (although nowadays most visas are granted for either 10 years or at least the duration of study/work).
First of all, the validity of visa here is not equivalent to the validity of the visa status.
The distinction between visa (entry authorization) and immigration status is made in a number of countries. Many countries (e.g. China, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Iran) allow the duration of authorized stay to be different from the visa validity, e.g. you can enter on the last day of your visa validity and be admitted for more than one day.
In a number of countries (in particular many within EEA/Switzerland, also China and South Korea, and probably more), for certain situations, an alternative status document (residence permit) must be applied and obtained for a legal stay, although these documents can usually be used for entry as well.
Moreover, it is not possible to obtain/change the US visa while staying inside the country, yet it is possible to change the status.
Most countries above do allow visa application (or application for re-entry authorization) to be made within the country though. The impossibility to obtain an re-entry authorization inland might be somewhat exceptional for the U.S., someone else may have more knowledge or examples.
Pictures about "Why is visa not equivalent to visa status in the US?"
What is the difference between a visa and a status?
People often use the terms \u201cvisa\u201d and \u201cstatus\u201d to mean the same thing; they refer to different things. The term \u201cvisa\u201d refers only to the sticker you receive in your passport, whereas \u201cstatus\u201d refers to your formal immigration classification in the U.S. as indicated on one's I-94 record.What does no status mean US visa?
No status: Is displayed when you have not yet completed your visa interview. Ready means that your case is still open and ready for further processing. This could mean your interview is scheduled, documents still need to be submitted or you need to complete your biometrics.What is a visa status?
A U.S. visa status refers to the state of an application made for an immigrant or nonimmigrant visa that you can check using the database of the Consular Electronic Application Center (CEAC) Status Check.Why does my visa application say no status?
If your visa was denied or refused, then you will see the 'Refused' status on CEAC website. It essentially means that you could not prove to consular officer that you are eligible for issuance of visa. There could be many reasons, sometimes, they are denied under 214b, or other reasons.Refused Immigrant Visa Status Explained
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Nataliya Vaitkevich, Pixabay, Porapak Apichodilok, Karolina Grabowska