Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed]
![Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Emotionless African American female with coffee to go wearing casual wear and protective face mask leaving underground station and looking away in New York City](/assets/images/exit_immigration_asking_for_destination_and_potentially_having_the_ability_to_deny_a_citizen_the_leaving_of_the_country_closed_0.jpeg "Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Emotionless African American female with coffee to go wearing casual wear and protective face mask leaving underground station and looking away in New York City")
Edited the whole question in order make my point be understood.
I know that check-in staff and destination immigration officials check the papers permitting to reach the destination country, generally speaking, but in a country I'm a citizen of, also exit immigration checks this thing for its citizens, and in general exit immigration checks only whether a person has stayed in the country legally, not necessarily the eligibility to enter the destination country.
The main issue doesn't raise up for a person having no papers to enter the destination country, because they'd eventually be blocked at check-in in the first place, furthermore few people are stupid enough to take a flight with no necessary papers because they know that they'll further meet destination authorities.
The issue may concern a person who doesn't want to show the other passport to the immigration officer not because dual citizenship is illegal (it is legal), but because they simply don't want to reveal any additional data of themselves to an istitution who doesn't need them or is not entitled to know them in the first place, because out of their jurisdiction.
Provided I have no pending charge and having another citizenship is not illegal, why should they hold me in case I don't want to show them the other passport or a paper granting me access there, if the latter is not issued by them as well? How can I possibly be suspected of entering the destination country illegally if I have passed check-in and they perfectly know that their destination counterparts at entry will check me themselves?
i can understand an answer of the kind of "it's their country and they can do whatever they want" but either there are reasons behind it or it should be said that their laws, despite being legit for sovreignity principle, are just stupid and meaningless.
Does it happen in most countries this thing?
Best Answer
Most "3rd world" countries check their citizens' documents before leaving for two reasons:
1) To make sure they're not on a (international or national) watch-list. Like you said, a person could be on a watch-list for various reasons such as criminal charges, terrorist watch lists etc.
2) To make sure they have sufficient documentation for their onward journey. This is to make sure the passenger has the correct visa and to check for forgeries and impersonations.
All countries with exit controls will check how you entered when exiting. This is to make sure you did not violate the terms of your visa/permit. A dual-citizen will have to present the "3rd world" country's passport when exiting--there is no way around that.
Some countries--such as Uzbekistan--require exit visas for their own citizens to be allowed to leave.
If your country allows dual citizenship, you should show both your passports to prove you have permission to fly to your destination. If it doesn't, you will might be able to get away(although in some countries this may be a criminal offence):book your flight to a destination where you are allowed to travel visa free (or have a visa) on your "third world" country's passport. Then check-in again from there on your "1st world" country's passport.
Other than that, "normal people" should have no problems leaving their countries unless their documents are not in order.
Pictures about "Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed]"
![Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Crop person showing handmade flag of Israel](/assets/images/exit_immigration_asking_for_destination_and_potentially_having_the_ability_to_deny_a_citizen_the_leaving_of_the_country_closed_1.jpeg "Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Crop person showing handmade flag of Israel")
![Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Black woman in mask leaving metro train](/assets/images/exit_immigration_asking_for_destination_and_potentially_having_the_ability_to_deny_a_citizen_the_leaving_of_the_country_closed_2.jpeg "Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Black woman in mask leaving metro train")
![Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Closeup of map of Africa with countries borders and water on sunny day](/assets/images/exit_immigration_asking_for_destination_and_potentially_having_the_ability_to_deny_a_citizen_the_leaving_of_the_country_closed_3.jpeg "Exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed] - Closeup of map of Africa with countries borders and water on sunny day")
Do you need permission to leave a country?
As a State Department official puts it: \u201cNo one is allowed to enter a country that they're not a citizen of\u201d without permission from that country. \u201cIt's a privilege.\u201dCan you exit a country on one passport and enter on another?
Dual nationals may also be required by the foreign country to use its passport to enter and leave that country. Use of the foreign passport to travel to or from a country other than the United States is not inconsistent with U.S. law.Is there any way to leave the country without a passport?
In most countries, you can travel anywhere within your nation's borders without a passport. The only exception is when you leave your home country to enter a foreign nation. However, even if you travel nationally, you will always need photo ID, such as a driver's license or National ID card to board a flight.How do I get out of this country?
Move Out Of The US In 5 StepsThese Countries will DENY ENTRY at Immigration. Vacation Disasters
More answers regarding exit immigration asking for destination and potentially having the ability to deny a citizen the leaving of the country [closed]
Answer 2
Airlines check passports and visa because they may be fined if they bring unauthorized travelers. They will try to get the money back from the traveler, but that might fail. They are concerned with the right to enter the destination, not with the right to leave the origin.
Airport Security check identity documents to try and catch people who may be a security risk on the flight.
Emigration controls may check passports and other documents to keep track of people leaving the country. They are concerned with the right (or duty) to leave the origin country, but not usually with the right to enter the destination country.
Exit stamps on passports verify that visitors did not overstay their visa, but that mostly matters for the next application. Only a few countries will detain overstayers who want to leave, but most make a permanent record of that.
According to international conventions, no country may deny their citizens the right to leave, provided there are no criminal investigations, military service obligations, etc. They can of course check that there are no open warrants, and people don't have the right to enter another country, so the right to leave theirs can become meaningless.
During the Cold War, the Communist countries tried to stop their citizens from traveling to the West. In theory travel was possible, but in practice an ordinary citizen could not get the necessary permits. And this still happens in places like North Korea.
Answer 3
Let's say A1 is the “first-world¹,” B3 is the “third world,” you are citizen of both, it’s legal to have both, and you are not on some kind of watchlist. I’m not a hundred percent certain, but my suspicion is …
If you are trying to go from B3 to A1, and you show the A1 passport, no one you encounter knows you also have a B3 passport, and therefore no reason to interfere with your trip to “your own” country.
If you are trying to go from A1 to B3, and you show the B3 passport, no one you encounter knows you also have an A1 passport, and therefore no reason to interfere with your trip to “your own” country.
Of course, if you are on a watchlist, who knows? Or in one of those countries where everyone is effectively on a watchlist.
¹Where is the “second world”?
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Uriel Mont, Karolina Grabowska, Uriel Mont, Nothing Ahead